Companies indifferent to workers’ safety

5 February 2010

 

 Only a few companies in the country have systems in place to address occupa­tional health hazards, re­vealed the labour ministry during a week-long training on occupational health and safety management (OHS) in Phuentsholing.

Labour Officer Phuntsho Wangdi said occupational health and safety is under­lined in the Labour and Em­ployment Act 2007 but it has still not been effectively im­plemented because the rules and regulations governing it are still in the draft form. “The act needs to be worked on further so that it becomes clearer and specific,” he said.

The labour act states that an employer shall provide and maintain a working en­vironment for employees that is safe and without risks to health.

Phuntsho Wangdi said there is a need to educate people in order to start imple­menting the laws that govern occupational health, and ef­forts should be made by both the employers and the gov­ernment.

He said one of the main challenges of enforcing oc­cupational health and safety rules is convincing employers that safety measures would benefit both employers and employees.

“Employers are reluctant to provide safety gears to employees as there are cost implications,” said Phuntsho. “Employers don’t understand that, if they don’t take safety measures now, the compen­sations they will have to pay when mishaps occur could cost them a lot more than what they invest in safety gears.”

Occupational health haz­ards are categorized as physi­cal, chemical, biological, er­gonomic and psycho-social hazards. Chemical hazards are those caused by chemical compounds, noxious gases, dusts, pesticides and metals in industries that deal with chemicals.

Physical hazards are those caused by heat, humidity, light, noise, vibrations, pres­sure and harmful radiations. Biological hazards are a result of exposure to various bio­logical agents such as viruses, bacteria, parasites, fungi and moulds.

Ergonomic hazards are those caused by inappropri­ate working conditions. In or­der to avoid ergonomic haz­ards, the workstation should be fitted to the worker, rather than the worker fitting the workstation.

Mental stress, interper­sonal relations with superi­ors at work, alcohol and drug abuse, workplace violence and sexual harassment lead to psycho-social hazards.

Phuntsho Wangdi said the ministry had received five to six cases of occupational health hazards in 2008 and only a few sporadic cases since then. “There could be many such cases that go unre­ported,” he said, adding that “most of the cases reported were accidents related to con­struction.”

According to OHS sur­vey conducted by the labour ministry in 2007, safety and health standards at workplac­es were very low. Only less than 40 percent of the com­panies had an acceptable lev­el of machine guarding stan­dards, and half of them had safe electrical wiring for the machines. More than 60 per­cent of the companies recruit­ed machine operators who were not properly trained.

Although it was observed that most of the chemi­cal companies had kept the chemicals labeled and safe, only 20 percent had informa­tion sheets explaining safe use of the chemicals. Overall, only 55 percent of the compa­nies had acceptable standards of chemical safety.

 By Pushkar Chhetri

Ratings: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...
Email this page Email this page     Print this page Print this page    

Comments

2 Responses to “Companies indifferent to workers’ safety”

  1. D on February 5th, 2010 8:51 pm

    i think all the labour should provide a safety, like boots, raincoat, yellow hat and mask , and some people who have a baby should provide a babysitter. we should concern about all the people no matter its poor or rich. we can see everyday those labour working along the road, but nobody care, nobody cares about them . only they care about is how fast they can finished a wrok and rean money.
    i dont know how much they get paied? our contry is small and as some people say happniess county, and buddha contry, so think baout all this people who are not care about government . i think they should get more saftey and health care.

  2. Kinley Dorji on February 9th, 2010 3:54 pm

    well, i think inculating safety culture in Bhutan is one of the most challenging task for the Department of Labour Officals. we can see whether it is on the road, at home, office and entertainment places, the safety standard is very poor and there is no Bhutanese who is taking care in terms of OHS. now, with the enactment of the Labour and Employment Act, 2007 and within no time get the OHS rules and regulation through and implement the law efficiently.

    why? DoL has to implement effectively, because there are lots of tourism going fly in to our country and inorder to have some safety standard in place and most importantly for the safety of the workers.

    so, lets join our hand and say SAFETY FIRST.

Leave your comment





Note: Comments are moderated by Bhutan Observer, and may not appear until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

Bhutan Observer is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache